USA Top 10 crypto casinos in Ohio

  • Casino News
  • USA News

California Fliff Sports Betting Case Will be Settled

A California judge has ruled that the class action lawsuit against Fliff, a social sportsbook, will be resolved through arbitration. This decision affects claims of illegal online sports betting and sets a precedent for the industry.
facebook twitter twitter

Branimir Ivanov | Senior News Contributor

Updated: Sep 13, 2024

is California moving in the right direction

 

In a significant decision for the sports betting industry, a California district court judge has ruled that a class action lawsuit against the social sportsbook Fliff will be settled through arbitration. This ruling, delivered by Judge Sunshine S. Sykes on January 5, marks a decisive victory not only for Fliff but potentially for other gambling companies facing similar legal challenges.

The lawsuit was initiated by Bishoy Nessim, who is seeking $7 million in a class action suit against Fliff, accusing the company of operating an illegal online sportsbook. Nessim's legal action, which began in June 2023, alleges that Fliff violated California’s Unfair Competition Law and engaged in unjust enrichment by providing a platform for online sports betting, which is illegal under California law.

Central to the court's ruling is the arbitration clause included in Fliff's Terms of Use and Sweepstakes Rules. When Nessim created his account in December 2022, he agreed to these terms by clicking a checkbox, effectively waiving his right to pursue legal action in court. Fliff's legal team argued that this agreement should compel arbitration, a motion that Judge Sykes upheld.

 

Key Points

  • Judge Sunshine S. Sykes: “Fliff provided sufficient evidence that Pennsylvania is its ‘principal place of business,' at least ‘at the time of contracting.'”
  • Bishoy Nessim: “Pennsylvania law is contrary to a fundamental California policy because Pennsylvania law permits mobile and online sports betting, while California statutes and the California Constitution forbid such activities.”
  • Fliff’s Legal Team: “There is no ‘material policy difference' between California and Pennsylvania as both states ban ‘unlicensed online sportsbook operations.'”

 

Legal Arguments and Implications

Nessim's argument hinged on the application of California law, given that Fliff’s sweepstakes app is available to California residents. He contended that Pennsylvania law, which permits mobile and online sports betting, is fundamentally at odds with California's stringent prohibitions on such activities. However, Fliff maintained that its sweepstakes rules complied with Pennsylvania gambling laws, as Pennsylvania was the company's principal place of business when the contract was formed.

Judge Sykes found Fliff’s evidence sufficient to establish Pennsylvania as the principal place of business at the relevant time, thus supporting the company's argument for arbitration. Fliff emphasized that both California and Pennsylvania laws prohibit unlicensed online sportsbook operations, negating any significant policy differences that could impact the case.

The case will now proceed to third-party arbitration, where a neutral arbitrator will review the evidence presented by both parties in a private process. This method of dispute resolution is often faster and more cost-effective than traditional court litigation, which can benefit companies like Fliff by reducing legal expenses and public exposure.

The ruling could set a precedent for other gambling companies operating in states with stringent betting laws. By upholding the arbitration agreement, the court has reinforced the importance of clearly stated terms and conditions in user agreements, potentially shielding companies from protracted and public legal battles.

Fliff operates differently from traditional real-money sportsbooks. Instead of direct monetary betting, players use “Fliff Cash” and “Fliff Coins” to participate in social gameplay. While Fliff Coins can be used for in-game activities and to earn loyalty points without any cash value, Fliff Cash can be redeemed for cash prizes or gift cards once players accumulate at least $50 in their accounts. This model allows Fliff to navigate legal restrictions in states where real-money sports betting is prohibited.

“Fliff provided sufficient evidence that Pennsylvania is its ‘principal place of business,' at least ‘at the time of contracting.'”

 

Conclusion

The decision to settle the Fliff class action lawsuit through arbitration marks a notable moment in the ongoing evolution of online sports betting regulations. It highlights the complexities of operating in a legally fragmented landscape and underscores the critical role of user agreements in protecting companies from litigation. As the industry continues to grow and adapt, this case may serve as a reference point for future legal challenges in the sports betting and gaming sectors.

The Hottest Usa casinos of 2024

USA Icon
US Players Accepted
Avantgarde Casino logo

Avantgarde Casino Review

USARated 100.00/100%

welcome bonus

400% Weekly Promotion

35x wagering (Deposit & Bonus)

Play
Number of games
20+
Payment methods
14
Game providers
5
Min deposit
25
US Players
Accepted
American Eagle
All-American Casino
SlotsandCasino Casino logo

SlotsandCasino Casino Review

USARated 99.98/100%

welcome bonus

300%/$1,500 + 100 Free Spins

30x wagering (Deposit & Bonus)

Play
Number of games
11+
Payment methods
6
Game providers
10
Min deposit
25
US Players
Accepted
burger
American Favorite
Cafe Casino logo

Cafe Casino Review

USARated 98.12/100%

welcome bonus

250%/$1,500

40x wagering (Deposit Only)

Play
Number of games
150+
Payment methods
8
Game providers
3
Min deposit
20
US Players
Accepted
Popularity Icon
Trending in the USA
DuckyLuck Casino logo

DuckyLuck Casino Review

USARated 99.97/100%

welcome bonus

500%/$2,500+ 150 Free Spins

30x wagering (Deposit & Bonus)

Play
Number of games
11+
Payment methods
6
Game providers
10
Min deposit
25
US Players
Accepted
trending topic
Hot in USA
Bovada Casino logo

Bovada Casino Review

USARated 99.12/100%

welcome bonus

100%/$1,000

25x wagering (Deposit Only)

Play
Number of games
10+
Payment methods
4
Game providers
3
Min deposit
20
US Players
Accepted
growth
Growing in USA
Ignition Casino logo

Ignition Casino Review

USARated 98.11/100%

welcome bonus

300%/$3,000

25x wagering (Deposit Only)

Play
Number of games
10+
Payment methods
5
Game providers
4
Min deposit
20
US Players
Accepted
USA Icon
US Players Accepted
Slots LV Casino logo

Slots LV Casino Review

USARated 98.13/100%

welcome bonus

200%/$3,000 + 30 Free Spins

35x wagering (Deposit & Bonus)

Play
Number of games
150+
Payment methods
4
Game providers
73
Min deposit
20
US Players
Accepted
gold medal
#1 Crypto 2024
BC.Game Casino logo

BC.Game Casino Review

USARated 99.46/100%

welcome bonus

360%/$220,000

60x wagering (Deposit & Bonus)

Play
Number of games
610+
Payment methods
5
Game providers
64
Min deposit
0.01
US Players
Accepted
Bitcoin Logo
Top Crypto Casino
7Bit Casino logo

7Bit Casino Review

USARated 99.39/100%

welcome bonus

325%/5 BTC + 250 Free Spins

40x wagering (Deposit Only)

Play
Number of games
75+
Payment methods
17
Game providers
20
Min deposit
10
US Players
Accepted
USA Icon
U.S. Choice Champion
JazzSports Casino logo

JazzSports Casino Review

USARated 97.96/100%

welcome bonus

200%/$2,000

40x wagering (Deposit & Bonus)

Play
Number of games
83+
Payment methods
7
Game providers
36
Min deposit
10
US Players
Accepted
10/ 10 (100%)

Related News

Illinois Flag

Illinois Restricts NFL Betting Types to Protect Game Integrity

California Flag

California’s Gaming Showdown: Tribes vs. Card Rooms

Amusnet

R. Franco Digital Integrates Amusnet’s Extensive Game Portfolio

hide-html