Game Suppliers in Denmark Face New Reporting Obligations

Game Suppliers in Denmark Face New Reporting Obligations

The Danish gambling authority, Spillemyndigheden, has announced changes to its certification process, shifting more compliance responsibilities onto game suppliers. The adjustments aim to restructure the reporting system, providing a clearer division of duties between operators and suppliers in Denmark's regulated gambling market.

Under the new framework, game suppliers must now submit their own annual compliance documentation, previously handled by operators. This change also affects B2C operators that develop their own games, requiring them to file separate reports for their licensing activities and game production.

To manage these submissions, Spillemyndigheden has outlined two distinct reporting categories:

• Licence Holder Certification: Applicable to operators managing licenses.
• Game Supplier Certification: For providers submitting reports on their own games.

The adjustment introduces a more segregated approach, ensuring each entity takes direct responsibility for its regulatory compliance.

Although the new reporting process is live, stakeholders have until July 1 to fully comply. This six-month transition period allows suppliers and operators to adapt to the requirements and integrate them into their processes.

Spillemyndigheden has outlined seven certification types in its Newsletter 58. These must be submitted annually, except for vulnerability scaling reports, which require quarterly submissions. The emphasis on frequent reporting in specific areas highlights the regulator's intent to monitor critical compliance more closely.

This shift represents a move towards decentralizing compliance responsibilities within the gambling sector. By requiring game suppliers to handle their own documentation, the regulator has redistributed accountability, creating a more streamlined system for oversight.

For suppliers, the new framework adds an operational requirement that could result in increased costs or the need for additional resources. However, the change also offers an opportunity to demonstrate regulatory adherence directly, which may help reinforce trust with stakeholders.

Operators, particularly those involved in game production, will need to adjust internal workflows to account for separate reporting. While this adjustment may seem procedural, it addresses potential accountability overlaps, reducing compliance enforcement ambiguities.

The introduction of independent reporting requirements reflects Spillemyndigheden's broader effort to refine Denmark's regulatory environment. These changes encourage a more self-sufficient approach to compliance, which may lead to a more organized and accountable gambling industry in the long term. As the July deadline approaches, affected parties must act promptly to avoid disruptions and ensure their operations align with the updated framework.

This regulatory shift may serve as a model for other jurisdictions, highlighting a more segmented approach to compliance as the industry evolves.